Last year, we spent the week before Christmas at Disney World. Our room at the Contemporary Resort was lovely, and morning routine involved my sleepy-eyed kids watching Disney XD while I made a pre-coffee run to the cafeteria for breakfast goodies. They quickly discovered what would soon became a favorite show of ours:
Phineas and Ferb.
The stories are wacky and fun, celebrating unbridled creativity and fantastic ways to carpe diem; the side adventures of brave, stoic Perry against his slightly neurotic nemesis (with back stories aplenty) always elicit a chuckle. The two boys (with a gaggle of neighborhood sidekicks) are forever optimistic, seeking clever (and usually over-the-top) solutions to any problem, no matter how mundane; Candace continues her never-ending quest to 'bust them', with little success, bless her heart.
This show is another example of all-ages fare that any adult can enjoy; there are plenty of jokes appealing to any age group, quipped during wild situations bursting with vivid imagination. It's wonderful to have a show extolling the virtues of creativity, and the various character interactions are priceless. Once again, the creative team behind the show is top notch, crafting entertaining and thought-provoking material of the highest quality.
I'm grateful to have discovered Phineas, Ferb, Candace, Perry and the rest of the gang. The show has always put a smile on my face, as well as those of my girls. If I could tap into my own creative potential like the boys do every episode, well, my Summers (and the rest of the time) would be pretty interesting indeed.
My blog is a series of reflections on hitting forty. I'll spend alot of time giving opinions on day-to-day stuff, talking about my family, and posting comic-related artwork.
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
C'mon grab your friends
I'm not quite sure when we 'discovered' Adventure Time; I'd guess I was channel surfing, and caught glimpses of it while landing on Teletoon. There was a great write-up about the show in a recent Entertainment Weekly, and I decided to give it a shot, since my kids (and I) are always on the look out for interesting cartoons to pass a bit of time in that nebulous period before bedtime.
So, we tried one....
And were hooked. Big time.
The thing is, I can't really explain why. The animation is simple (love those noodle limbs) and the stories brief. But this weird cartoon achieves what most media today simply can't:
I care about the characters.
Finn. Jake. Bubblegum Princess. Even LPS.
I love these guys!
Their cool wit makes me laugh out loud (no abbreviation here), and their antics are fun and often thought-provoking. The relationships between characters feel 'real' to me, which doesn't make a lot of sense considering the fantastic basis of their world (and is a testament to the amazing creative team behind the show). I love that AT is bright and vibrant (both in tone and design), and hopeful.
I guess the main thing I love about the show is that it has heart; it's obvious to me that each episode is a labor of love, painted with bold swatches of color for viewers of any age. Wild creativity prevails, from bears partying within the tummy of a monster, to a lovelorn and quite misunderstood Ice King searching for happiness.
Cartoons were an oasis for me as a child; they provided an escape from the terror and sadness of day-to-day life, and I will always be grateful for the wonderful gift of imagination they helped foster in me. As an 'old' man, I still haven't outgrown cartoons, although many produced today lack the innocent magic of ones from my youth.
Adventure Time is an incredibly special show, and one that I am grateful is on the air to share with my girls.
So, we tried one....
And were hooked. Big time.
The thing is, I can't really explain why. The animation is simple (love those noodle limbs) and the stories brief. But this weird cartoon achieves what most media today simply can't:
I care about the characters.
Finn. Jake. Bubblegum Princess. Even LPS.
I love these guys!
Their cool wit makes me laugh out loud (no abbreviation here), and their antics are fun and often thought-provoking. The relationships between characters feel 'real' to me, which doesn't make a lot of sense considering the fantastic basis of their world (and is a testament to the amazing creative team behind the show). I love that AT is bright and vibrant (both in tone and design), and hopeful.
I guess the main thing I love about the show is that it has heart; it's obvious to me that each episode is a labor of love, painted with bold swatches of color for viewers of any age. Wild creativity prevails, from bears partying within the tummy of a monster, to a lovelorn and quite misunderstood Ice King searching for happiness.
Cartoons were an oasis for me as a child; they provided an escape from the terror and sadness of day-to-day life, and I will always be grateful for the wonderful gift of imagination they helped foster in me. As an 'old' man, I still haven't outgrown cartoons, although many produced today lack the innocent magic of ones from my youth.
Adventure Time is an incredibly special show, and one that I am grateful is on the air to share with my girls.
Monday, May 27, 2013
Star Trek:Into Darkness
I'll admit that I remember fondly watching Star Trek as a youngster Sunday mornings before shuffling off to church (I'd miss the last 15 minutes resolution of any episode, which was quite frustrating). I remain charmed by the spirit of that show, and maybe it colors my outlook on Hollywood's latest spectacular.
As the movie progressed, I chuckled at some fun bits, stared in shock at others (although I knew Khan was the villain, it was still a 'holey shit' moment for me), and felt numb by the relentless 'action'. As the credits rolled, I couldn't figure out if I actually liked the movie.
Mulling it over, I find that Star Trek: Into Darkness is a typical 'modern' blockbuster, throwing everything and the kitchen sink at the viewer relentlessly. Larger than life characters! Do-or-die situations! Over-the-top villainy!
Interesting story with characters I care about?
Not so much.
It's probably just me. Maybe I'm dumb, but I didn't get the whole story. It seemed that things happened just to prod the plot conveniently forward. Stuff was mentioned that probably should've been shown to dramatic effect; and time was spent on scenes that missed the mark for me.
Characters spouted off lines, but I just didn't believe them, nor did I really care.
The Kirk I 'know' is brash, arrogant, and takes calculated gambles to defy the odds; Pine's version is frantic, reckless, and doesn't seem to deserve the rank he's been given (as he himself states). His dynamic with Quinto seems like a hollow echo of the Shatner/Nimoy banter, and the entire movie's mirroring of Wrath of Khan only serves to demonstrate how superior that latter film actually is to it.
Consider: WOK uses pace to incredible effect; events happen gradually, leading to a dramatic crescendo. ID is loud, explosive scenes threaded together haphazardly. The former film has a clear theme with intense emotional pay-off by its climax; the latter seems unfocused and weighed down by too many ideas crammed into it. Of course, critics feel that flawed characters doing questionable things makes them 'believable', but I found the ethics lesson distracted from the pulpy adventure.
I did enjoy Cumberbatch, although I wish he'd displayed actual 'brilliance' in addition to suave menace. I guess that's my main complaint overall, now that I mention it: I wish the plot would've depended on 'smart' folk making clever, strategic decisions to save the day, rather than attractive characters punching and kicking their way to a fireworks resolution.
Comparing this hyperactive action movie to those low-budget episodes filled with heart just serves to remind me: less can indeed be more.
As the movie progressed, I chuckled at some fun bits, stared in shock at others (although I knew Khan was the villain, it was still a 'holey shit' moment for me), and felt numb by the relentless 'action'. As the credits rolled, I couldn't figure out if I actually liked the movie.
Mulling it over, I find that Star Trek: Into Darkness is a typical 'modern' blockbuster, throwing everything and the kitchen sink at the viewer relentlessly. Larger than life characters! Do-or-die situations! Over-the-top villainy!
Interesting story with characters I care about?
Not so much.
It's probably just me. Maybe I'm dumb, but I didn't get the whole story. It seemed that things happened just to prod the plot conveniently forward. Stuff was mentioned that probably should've been shown to dramatic effect; and time was spent on scenes that missed the mark for me.
Characters spouted off lines, but I just didn't believe them, nor did I really care.
The Kirk I 'know' is brash, arrogant, and takes calculated gambles to defy the odds; Pine's version is frantic, reckless, and doesn't seem to deserve the rank he's been given (as he himself states). His dynamic with Quinto seems like a hollow echo of the Shatner/Nimoy banter, and the entire movie's mirroring of Wrath of Khan only serves to demonstrate how superior that latter film actually is to it.
Consider: WOK uses pace to incredible effect; events happen gradually, leading to a dramatic crescendo. ID is loud, explosive scenes threaded together haphazardly. The former film has a clear theme with intense emotional pay-off by its climax; the latter seems unfocused and weighed down by too many ideas crammed into it. Of course, critics feel that flawed characters doing questionable things makes them 'believable', but I found the ethics lesson distracted from the pulpy adventure.
I did enjoy Cumberbatch, although I wish he'd displayed actual 'brilliance' in addition to suave menace. I guess that's my main complaint overall, now that I mention it: I wish the plot would've depended on 'smart' folk making clever, strategic decisions to save the day, rather than attractive characters punching and kicking their way to a fireworks resolution.
Comparing this hyperactive action movie to those low-budget episodes filled with heart just serves to remind me: less can indeed be more.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)